LegalCaseDocs.com
shopping cart  
  |     
Search
 

 
New Visitors


 VeriSign Secure Site

 Get Adobe Reader

WOODS v MONY LEGACY LIFE INS Click to find out why . . .



Keywords & Phrases
CourtCode: AP, CourtName: NEW YORK COURT OF APPEALS, Plaintiff: WOODS, State: NEW YORK, UniqueCaseRef: NE>AP>084_0280, Account, Ucc, Bank, Mony, Woods, Customer, Forgery, Collins, Mony Market, Signature, Administering, Request, Uniform, Dismiss, Receiving, Drafts, Reason, Appellant, Amounts, Paid, Instrument, Purposes, Confirmation, Monthly Statements, Affirm, Commercial Code, Alterations, Notified Mony , ContentID: 120250731

Case Documents
1 1994-10-20 OPINION
[ see first page and extracted highlights below  ] ItemID: 124640
4 pages
HTML
Total Documents: 1 document , 4 pages
Price: $ 19.95


IVESLCD01 KGI0001
 
 

 Forgot your password?


1 . OPINION

EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
UCC
BANK
MONY
WOODS
CUSTOMER
FORGERY
COLLINS
PLAINTIFF
MONY MARKET
SIGNATURE
ADMINISTERING
REQUEST
UNIFORM
DEFENDANT
DISMISS
RECEIVING
DRAFTS
REASON
APPELLANT
AMOUNTS
PAID
INSTRUMENT
PURPOSES
CONFIRMATION
MONTHLY STATEMENTS
AFFIRM
COMMERCIAL CODE
ALTERATIONS
NOTIFIED MONY


  Dorothy Woods, Appellant, v. MONY Legacy Life Insurance Company, Respondent

    84 N.Y.2d 280, 641 N.E.2d 1070, 617 N.Y.S.2d 452 (1994).
    October 20, 1994

   4 No. 161 (1994 NY Int. 154) Decided October 20, 1994
     _________________________________________________________________

   This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication
   in the New York Reports.

   John A. Collins, for appellant.
   Cindy Kaplan Bennes, for respondent.

   KAYE, CHIEF JUDGE:

   UCC 4-406(4) bars suit to recover amounts paid by a bank on a forged
   instrument unless the customer gives written notice of the forgery
   within one year of the time the account statement was made available.
   On this appeal, defendant claims it should be treated as a "bank" for
   purposes of applying UCC 4-406(4) because it performed the function of
   a bank in administering plaintiff's money market checking account. We
   conclude that defendant was entitled to invoke UCC 4-406 and that,
   because plaintiff failed to give timely notice, the complaint was
   properly dismissed.

   Arthur Woods died in December 1989 holding an annuity issued by MONY
   Legacy Life Insurance Company, payable on his death to his wife,
   Dorothy Woods. The attorney for the estate, Cornelius F. Collins,
   contacted MONY and requested that the proceeds of the annuity be paid
   to plaintiff Dorothy Woods in a lump sum. Accordingly, on March 8,
   1990, MONY transferred the $24,900 proceeds of the annuity to a "MONY
   Market" checking account in Woods' name, forwarded the checkbook to
   Collins and sent a statement to Woods confirming the amount of the
   benefit and the opening of the account. On March 26, MONY received a
   change of address request, purportedly signed March 21 by plaintiff
   Woods, directing that all future correspondence regarding her account
   be sent to Collins. MONY made the change and sent a confirmation to
   Woods at her home address.

   Between March 21 and July 17, 1990, six unauthorized checks bearing
   Woods' forged signature--in the total amount of $24,448.91--were drawn
   on the MONY Market account. The monthly statements reflecting these
   forged drafts were mailed to Collins on March 31, April 30, May 31,
   June 30 and July 31, 1990. Plaintiff Woods claims she first discovered
   the existence of the MONY Market account in May or June 1991. She
SNIPPETS:
  • Dorothy Woods, Appellant, v. MONY Legacy Life Insurance Company, Respondent
  • UCC 4-406bars suit to recover amounts paid by a bank on a forged instrument unless the
  • defendant claims it should be treated as a "bank" for purposes of applying UCC 4-406because
  • We conclude that defendant was entitled to invoke UCC 4-406 and that, because plaintiff
  • Arthur Woods died in December 1989 holding an annuity issued by MONY Legacy Life Insurance
  • The attorney for the estate, Cornelius F. Collins, contacted MONY and requested that the
  • Accordingly, on March 8, 1990, MONY transferred the $24,900 proceeds of the annuity to a
  • On March 26, MONY received a change of address request, purportedly signed March 21 by
  • The monthly statements reflecting these forged drafts were mailed to Collins on March 31,
  • On November 7, 1991, Woods notified MONY that the signatures on the six drafts were forgeries
  • On MONY's motion to dismiss, Supreme Court dismissed the complaint and the Appellate Division
  • We granted leave and now affirm.
  • The UCC imposes strict liability on a bank that charges against a customer's account any item
  • Commercial Code, 73 Georgetown L Rev 1399, 1404).
  • However, banks may assert a defense under UCC 4-406, which provides that "ithout regard to
  • This provision is derived from the depositor's common law duty to examine drafts and
  • Other jurisdictions to consider the question have concluded, as do we, that there is no tion")).
  • As plaintiff does not dispute that Collins had previously contacted MONY on behalf of the
  •    |